Start Here

The State of Poverty in the US

According to the U.S. Census, in the first quarter of 2010, nearly half of the population (48.5%) lived in a household that had at least one member who received some kind of government benefit. This record-high represents a 9% increase since the third quarter of 2008, amidst the global financial crisis. This data highlights not only the severity of the collapse, but also the increase in government benefits over the decades that have served to fill only a partial economic gap that has been created due trade policies that have impoverished tens of millions, as of jobs have been outsourced.  

Washington distributes tax dollars based on a variety of mechanisms. By far, the most common and largest benefits arise from the various means-tested programs specifically designed to help the needy. In 2010, needs-based programs accounted for the largest share of recipients, with approximately 34.2% of Americans living in households that received benefits such as food stamps, subsidized housing, cash welfare or Medicaid. An additional 14.5% lived in homes where someone was on Medicare. And nearly 16% lived in households receiving Social Security.
 
 
Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare comprise the nation’s entitlement programs, and are thus paid for by taxes as a form of social insurance. However, the chronically high unemployment rate has decreased the percentage of Americans who pay taxes. This is making the solvency of each program worse.
Based on estimates from the Tax Policy Center, 46.4% of households will pay no federal income tax in 2011, up from 39.9% in 2007, when the recession began.
Some 70% of the 19 million households (over 40 million Americans) that relied on food stamps last year had no earned income. Nearly half of all food-stamp recipients (47%) were children under the age of 18. Another 8% of recipients were age 60 or older. Whites made up the largest share of food stamp households, 35.7%. Some 22% of households receiving food stamps were counted as African American and 10% were Hispanic. U.S. born citizens made up the majority, 94%, of food stamp households.
 
 
Nearly 21% of households on food stamps also received Supplemental Security Income, assistance for the aged and blind. Some 21.4% received Social Security benefits. Just 8% of households also received Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or the cash welfare program.
But 20% of households had no cash income of any kind last year (up from 15% in 2007, and 7% in 1990) because they were also unemployed. Just 21.8% of them had jobs in 2010, while 19.8% were jobless and looking for work. More than half of household heads who received food stamps, 51.1%, weren’t in the labor force and weren’t searching for work. On average, food stamp households brought home $731 per month in gross income. Their food assistance averaged $287 a month.
 

Restrictions Against Reproduction: No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner and the Publisher.

These articles and commentaries cannot be reposted or used in any publications for which there is any revenue generated directly or indirectly. These articles cannot be used to enhance the viewer appeal of any website, including any ad revenue on the website, other than those sites for which specific written permission has been granted. Any such violations are unlawful and violators will be prosecuted in accordance with these laws.

Article 19 of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

This publication (written, audio and video) represents the commentary and/or criticisms from Mike Stathis or other individuals affiliated with Mike Stathis or AVA Investment Analytics (referred to hereafter as the “author”). Therefore, the commentary and/or criticisms only serve as an opinion and therefore should not be taken to be factual representations, regardless of what might be stated in these commentaries/criticisms. There is always a possibility that the author has made one or more unintentional errors, misspoke, misinterpreted information, and/or excluded information which might have altered the commentary and/or criticisms. Hence, you are advised to conduct your own independent investigations so that you can form your own conclusions. We encourage the public to contact us if we have made any errors in statements or assumptions. We also encourage the public to contact us if we have left out relevant information which might alter our conclusions. We cannot promise a response, but we will consider all valid information.


0:00
0:00