Wall Street, The Media, The CIA And Facebook: Confluence Of Fraud, Deceit And Espionage In The Decay Of Society (Part 2)
Thursday, December 22, 2011, by Stathis

 
 
 
We continue from Part 1
 
Facebook’s Bait-and-Switch
When Facebook began it didn’t have any advertisements. Similar to most small companies which embrace the capitalist growth model, Facebook changed from serving its users to serving corporations. I argue this was Zuckerberg’s intention from the very beginning. We have seen the same transformation take place (albeit more slowly) with eBay, Yahoo!, YouTube and several other sites.
The strategy used by most websites is to first focus on building a large user base. This is achieved by offering exceptional features or posting original content or some other way to create the perception of value. The intent is to lure users. Once the user base is large, the site owners pull the old bait-and-switch routine as they begin to focus more on the advertisers than the users.
While most people take the bait, rarely do they spot the switch or else realize its full ramifications. Alternatively, they don’t care when these sites realign themselves towards corporate agendas because society has conditioned them against forward-thinking.  
Like all social media, Facebook is designed as a Trojan horse. It markets itself as a site for its users. This is specifically why the term social networking is often used by users to reflect the perceived utility of these sites.  However, social media has been designed specifically to hook users into a myriad of ads, many of which are disguised. In this manner, it resembles traditional media.
Facebook isn’t merely in the business of selling ad space. It sells targeted ad space based on each user’s profile and pattern of use on the site. The ads are selected and placed in a way to capture the most attention from each individual based on their preferences, behaviors, likes and dislikes.  
Corporate America spends nearly $400 billion each year in advertising and marketing, and nearly half of this amount is spent online.  With billions of dollars to be made, can you really trust Facebook with your information?
Corporate ad dollars are drawn to social media because ads are linked to the statistics, emotions and behavioral patterns of each user. Ads found on social media are designed to focus on certain aspects of emotional and psychological response and reaction so that subconscious messages are implanted into the mind of the targeted user. This type of advertising is much more manipulative that the Joe Camel category.
 
While Microsoft and Google surpass the data collection and analysis technologies used by Facebook, the big distinction is that users remain largely anonymous when they use websites and applications run by Microsoft and Google. In contrast, when you use social media, you have no anonymity. That means advertisers can target your thoughts and anticipate your reactions.
 
Some may be thinking that they can hide or not publish their phone number, address, age, etc. But you’ll notice that Facebook goes to extremes to make certain you are who you say you are. In some countries, Facebook now require phone number verification for new accounts. Think about that for a minute.
 
Advertiser access to your name, phone number, date and place of birth, siblings, marital status and so forth does not even represent the big concern. Thanks to Washington, this type of data has been transformed into a commodity utilized by data brokers and black market fraudsters.
 
The most vital data being mining by Facebook and other social networking sites probes into your brain to deliver the most intimate details that no other source has access to. This type of data commands a premium price for advertisers because it can only be harvested through social media sites.
 
Specifically, I am speaking about the most personal and intimate information that only you and perhaps your closest mate knows; your habits, your login location, the books, songs and movies you like or dislike and your reactions to each, what you think is funny, sad, tragic and so forth.
 
By recording all of your responses to every communication made on Facebook, a behavioral profile can be generated that can predict how you will respond to certain colors, scenarios, etc. Facebook has been working with several advertising firms that focus on this type of targeting. I know this for a fact.
 
Over time, user activity on Facebook can add up to an enormous amount of data rapidly, especially considering the SOLE PURPOSE of Facebook is to obtain as much information from its users as possible so it can sell it to corporations.
 
Although it’s impossible for anyone outside of Facebook staff to know with confidence, in my rough estimation, a typical Facebook user is likely to generate more than 100,000 data points over the course of a year if you include data that can be generated through advanced behavioral algorithms. 
 
You can be sure that every piece of data is being stored, processed, compiled, analyzed and entered into a variety of behavioral algorithms for use by advertisers. This alone is damaging enough. If you are unable to understand why, then you probably think no harm has come to you or your children as a result of watching TV. And I haven’t even discussed the use of corporate-sponsored viral marketing campaigns scattered throughout social media sites.
 
 
If you think your problems end there, you are mistaken. Your personal data…all of it…is not only being sold to corporations, it is also being sold to government agencies, federal agents and law enforcement personnel. All major websites in the U.S. – Microsoft, Yahoo!, Google, You Tube, Facebook, MSN, AOL, etc. - mine data from each user and actually distribute a price list to government authorities and law enforcement divisions.  
 
 
Some already know that virtually every corporation with access to your data is selling it to government agencies, from telephone service providers and financial institutions to satellite navigation services. Even when they insist they aren’t selling it, I will guarantee you they are. There are many ways to get around privacy laws. Other companies ignore them completely because as you will see shortly, there are virtually no penalties for noncompliance with these laws.
 
So what is it that law enforcement divisions do with this information? Would you believe they use it to set speed traps
Have a look for yourself. 
 
What about Facebook?
 
We know the site has been selling user data for some time now.
 
But remember, the data retrieved from Facebook is much less anonymous than other sources because you still have some anonymity on other websites. With Facebook, they know who you are, so they can link your likes and dislikes to your address. Advertisers can essentially read your mind using the compiled myriad of data that Facebook collects. The same applies to the government.
 
As an example illustrating the how advertisers can target their products, take a look at the advertising bid prices on Facebook based on where the user works.
 
 
In the not-so-distant future, court cases will be determined based largely on information harvested and manipulated from social media sites. Eventually, prosecutors will have enough data on you to generate bogus circumstantial evidence if they want you behind bars.
 
Even today, it has become a common practice for prosecutors to check the Facebook entries of defendants for any incriminating information. Employers snoop around as well when they are reviewing job applicants, looking for politically incorrect language or statements, unethical behavior and other items. Already, many Facebook users have lost their job or have been denied employment as a result of entries they made to their Facebook account.
 
But Federal agents aren’t laying idle waiting for Mr. Zuckerberg to send them your data. They are scattered all over social networking sites, undercover of course, looking for thought crimes and fugitives. 
 
Why isn’t the media making a big issue of this? That’s like asking why the criminal didn’t turn himself in.
Remember that Facebook is part of the media club run by the Jewish mafia.
 
Can You REALLY Trust Mark Zuckerberg? 
Is Mark Zuckerberg a person you can trust to safeguard your personal information?
Remember, we are talking about the battle between money and honesty. In my opinion, anyone who goes into the media would sell their soul for a buck.
 
 
Let’s consider a few points. As many now know, Zuckerberg stole the idea for Facebook from a couple of college classmates. They asked Zuckerman to develop a website that would connect all of the students and faculty on campus. And instead of finishing their site (which was to be called Harvard Connect) Zuckerberg abandoned the project and decided to make his own. Not long after, he moved to Silicon Valley to chase venture capital funding. 
So it wasn’t as if Zuckerberg was sitting in his dorm and decided to steal the idea for Facebook so he could make his own site while he continued his college studies. We are talking about a premeditated scheme here. Within months of beginning the site, Zuckerberg was contacting venture capital firms to pitch Facebook.  Soon after, he dropped out of college and moved to Silicon Valley to be closer to his investors. That’s what you call devious and sneaky.
According to previously published material, in the early days of Facebook (before it was even called Facebook), Zuckerberg exchanged instant messages to a friend, discussing what he planned to do with his business colleagues. Let’s take a look at the real Mark Zuckerberg when he is outside of the spotlight. 
FRIEND: so have you decided what you are going to do about the websites?
ZUCK: yea I’m going to fuck them
ZUCK: probably in the year
ZUCK: *ear
In another exchange, Zuckerberg bragged to a friend that he could get information on anyone he wanted at Harvard.
ZUCK: yea so if you ever need info about anyone at harvard
ZUCK: just ask
ZUCK: i have over 4000 emails, pictures, addresses, sns
FRIEND: what!? how’d you manage that one?
ZUCK: people just submitted it
ZUCK: i don’t know why
ZUCK: they “trust me”
ZUCK: dumb fucks
Throughout the brief history of Facebook, Zuckerberg has established a predictable pattern of deceitful and cunning behavior, from changing the terms of service, to setting users public information as the default without notifying users in advance. Rather than leave the site forever, users make a fuss until Zuckerberg reverses the changes.  And this appeases users.  Within months, he’s back at it again, looking to hoodwink users. And the cycle repeats over and over. How can so many people be so naïve? By now, anyone who doesn’t realize what he’s up to is a lost cause.
 
As you watch the video below, you should ask yourself if it was created by a "credible" news source. While you may not recognize the names or the news network presented in the video, the question of credibility should be based entirely on the video’s accuracy.   
 
 
The video also points to the ease by which any media venue can manipulate its audience to believe that the news is an accurate depiction of reality. This particular video just so happens to be accurate. And it reinforces virtually everything I have been saying about Facebook and other social media platforms for years.
 
The next video goes into more details regarding the purpose and intent of Facebook, as well its partnership with the Department of Defense. If you doubt anything in this video, I encourage you to verify things for yourself, as I have.
 
 
 
 
Jews Policing Jews Always Leads to Crime WITHOUT Punishment
Recently, the Federal Trade Commission concluded a two-year investigation into Facebook to determine whether it had engaged in unfair and deceptive business practices as the result of its misappropriate disclosure of user privacy.  
 
The FTC determined that Facebook was guilty of numerous violations of unauthorized data sharing. What was the penalty to Facebook imposed by the FTC? There were no fines and no criminal charges. Instead, the FTC is requiring Facebook to adhere to twenty years of biennial privacy audits. It must also obtain consent from its users before sharing their information.
In other words, the FTC is basically saying “it’s okay that Facebook illegally shared user data, but they must not do it again.” The settlement is similar to that reached with Google’s Buzz earlier in the year.
Let’s take a closer look at some facts.
Facebook and Google violated similar privacy laws.
Facebook and Google are run by Jews.
Facebook and Google escaped any type of punishment.
Facebook and Google are assisting the Department of Defense in compiling user information.
The Chairman of the FTC is Jon Leibowitz; not the failed comedian who hosts the Daily Show and changed his name to Jon Stuart. This is a different Jon Leibowitz, who is also Jewish and most likely a failure, which appears to be a prerequisite for a top position in Washington.
Facebook received no punishment whatsoever for breaking a federal law intended to protect consumers. I suppose it helps when you have friends in high places. 
 
 
 
Although the FTC failed to punish Facebook for unauthorized sharing of user data (which has put users in potential danger) Leibowitz boasted that the settlement demonstrates that his agency “will use every tool at its disposal to ensure that every company, not just Facebook, treats its users' privacy with care and respect.”
If in fact “every tool at its disposal” was used, we might as well shut down the FTC as an effort to reduce wasteful government spending. Requiring Facebook to obtain prior consent from users prior to sharing their information is like telling a person who robbed a bank that he won’t go to jail for what he has done and reminding him that he shouldn’t do it again.
I came across a couple of noteworthy comments from a recent article discussing the settlement with the FTC.
 
From Sara…
 
“They're settling on this because they're doing so many other unethical things that no one realizes yet. They just wanted to get out from under the microscope. I'll never go back to Facebook. They wanted me to send them a government issued photo ID to prove I was using my real name. I said no, it was a violation of privacy. They locked my account so I couldn't get in, even to deactivate it. I had to threaten to go to the media if they didn't delete it for me. Finally they did. Be careful, folks. Big brother is watching you.”
 
Dirk…
 
“Evil empire. All of them.”
 
The settlement by the FTC sets precedence for illegal sharing of user data. If you have a website, according to the FTC, you are permitted to share user data even if you claim that you won’t. You can sell the data to all kinds of criminals and scum bags. And if you get caught, you shouldn’t face any real punishment, right? Don’t bet on it unless you are Jewish or unless you’re working with the CIA to help compile the most intimate data on individuals. 
 
The outcome of the FTC settlement with Facebook has been a common theme in the U.S. for many years. When you are part of a global criminal syndicate, the best way to escape prosecution for your crimes is to make sure the police are “your men.” This accounts for the reason why not a single Wall Street executive has faced criminal charges for their role in the massive securities fraud that destroyed the global economy.
 
 
 
As the facts reveal, Washington is owned by the Jewish mafia, from Congress and the White House to nearly every government agency, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commodities and Futures Commission, the Department of Justice, FBI, CIA, DHS and NSA.  
 
Facebook and the Jewish Mafia
In a previous article I discussed that the Jewish mafia gained control over industry and commerce, the media, the banking system, educational system, governments and virtually everything else by Jewish networking.
 
 
“A large component of the Jewish network emphasizes ties to cultural identity, consistent values, and a common racial, religious, ethnic and cultural heritage. These common attributes make Jewish people a very strong and cohesive force. These are the attributes most often leveraged during the Jewish networking process. Those who share these attributes are deemed to be loyal to the tribe. They are the largest benefactors of Jewish networking. Those who do not share a sufficient amount of these attributes are deemed as being disloyal to the tribe, and are not provided with favors by those in the network. This would not be problematic if it were not for the fact that Jewish networking is focused on unqualified enrichment of Jewish people at the expense of others, often by criminal means.
And no one is better at reaching out to leverage their power in other industries than Jews. Each of these units of power works with others in different industries and government bodies in a variety of ways. Sometimes, they share confidential information in order to help Israel. Other times, they use insider information for securities fraud. Rarely do they worry about being caught because they have friends in all of the high places, from the legal system to the White House. Ultimately, the power of Jewish networking always prevails over honesty and integrity. This poses as another problem.
Through Jewish networking, a small group of Jews has managed to gain a ridiculous amount of power. Like other deviants, they also use money to buy off the right people. The difference is that they have an enormous supply of money due to their control of the banking system, Wall Street, media and entertainment and much of corporate America. In reality, much of this money has been stolen through fraud."
 
Is it by chance that large social media sites are run by Jewish individuals? I argue that this arrangement has been engineered by specific mechanisms for very specific reasons. We see the same arrangement with the same motives with the traditional media, which exists solely to brainwash Americans all while pimping out the goods and services of corporate America. We even see a similar arrangement with the vast majority of alternative media, which serves to steer its audience in the wrong direction. 
 
Moreover, we need to ask why only Jewish-run social media sites have become dominant.
 
So what is the answer to these two questions?
 
Social media firms like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Groupon and Zynga (each one run by Jews) have benefited greatly from the assistance of Jewish finance capital from their friends in the venture capital industry and Wall Street. As a result, each of these firms has experienced a huge pump in valuation despite the fact that each firm is close to useless, providing no real value whatsoever.
 
 
In fact, Groupon encourages excessive consumerism that boosts corporate and banking profits. It has been this level of consumerism that has partly been responsible for the demise of the United States.
 
 
 
In addition to unhindered access to Jewish finance capital, social media sites have benefited tremendously from persistent endorsement and free advertising provided by the Jewish-run media industry. As a result, Jewish-run social media sites have grown by use of Jewish finance capital and promotion by the Jewish media. 
 
In contrast, MySpace, was formed many years before Facebook. It was once the most popular social media site. However, MySpace never received the benefit of these powerful resources. The reason for this is was because MySpace was formed and run by gentiles.
 
A few years ago before Facebook was hardly known, it was rare for the media to pimp MySpace with the line "follow us on MySpace."  Because MySpace was founded by gentiles, it was not viewed as part of the "system" of mass media manipulation by the Jewish media. In other words, the Jewish media establishment viewed MySpace as an “outsider.” 
 
The Jewish mafia would never let a gentile (outsider) run a large media firm because it would threaten to disrupt the monopoly of lies, deceit, censorship and fraud that have become synonymous with the media. Therefore, MySpace had one of two remaining fates. It would either be overtaken by a competitor, or it would be bought out if it established itself as the dominant leader of social media. 
 
While the popularity of Facebook was rising, that of MySpace was in decline. But MySpace was still a big player in the social media space. Zionist Jew media mogul Rupert Murdoch viewed the declining momentum of MySpace as an opportunity, so his News Corp. purchased MySpace to ensure that all media remained in the control of Jewish hands. The problem was Murdoch waited too late for his purchase because MySpace was already in a death spiral.
 
 
If Murdoch had purchased MySpace a couple of years earlier, I can guarantee you the broadcast and print media would have pimped MySpace. But since the Jewish mafia decided to embrace Jewish-run Facebook in order to thwart the leadership of MySpace, there would be no need to buy the social media firm.
 
Murdoch thought he could resurrect MySpace’s decelerating popularity using the leverage of his media empire, as well as his position within the Jewish mafia. What he failed to realize was that social media is a bit different than traditional media. Once the buzz behind a social media site fades, users defect for the next “new thing.” In fact, the number of active users can collapse very rapidly. At a price tag of $580 million, the purchase of MySpace by Murdoch's News Corp. was a foolish move, as I discussed in the past.
 
At the time of this purchase, I stated that MySpace was worth approximately $55 million according to my own valuation analysis. As it turns out, my estimate wasn’t that far off. After finally realizing that MySpace was nothing more than a website with a buzz that had faded, Murdoch recently sold it for a paltry $35 million resulting in a huge loss to News Corp. shareholders. These days, a $550 million loss is the least of the problems for shareholders of News Corp.
 
I didn’t expect Murdoch or the MBA grunts in News Corp.’s M&A department to understand how to properly value MySpace because the task requires a great deal of subjectivity, breadth of knowledge and good judgment. These are not the type of skills one gains from a business school program. And the few who enter business school with these skills rarely retain them by the time they have finished their studies. 
  
Now that Facebook has permeated into the lives of unwary users, the Jewish-run media continues to pimp Facebook helping to further inflate its popularity. The Jewish-run media monopoly is also pimping Twitter and other social media because it doesn’t want to be left out in the cold; after all, what better candidates to partner with than those run by members of your own tribe?
 
The continuous promotion of Facebook by the Jewish-run media provides a key resource for Facebook because it affects the buzz of the site. And without the buzz, Facebook would quickly be dead in the water.   
 
Jewish-run venture capital and Wall Street firms have also provided a big boost to Facebook. Specifically, the mega-Zionist investment bank Goldman Sachs helped secure the fate of Facebook by providing financing and early assistance with its IPO. Ever since then, Facebook’s valuation has continued to soar. Take a guess who has been churning these inflated valuation estimates; the same firms that have invested billions into Facebook.
 
In the Part 3, I will discuss more about Facebook’s valuation and the pump-and-dump scheme orchestrated by Wall Street.  Read Part 3 now.
 
In the final part I will discuss more details about the role of Goldman Sachs in the Facebook pump-and-dump.
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Read more articles for "Crooks, Liars & Idiots"