As Washington becomes more aware of the national security threats posed by foreign students who specifically come to U.S. universities to obtain advanced degrees in the sciences.
Unfortunately, today President Trump is trying to ban foreign student enrollment in Harvard University as punishment for Harvard allowing campus protests by foreign students who are against the inhumane slaughter of innocent men, women and children in Palestine.
Sadly, as has been the case with all U.S. presidents since at least the early 20th century, President Trump is controlled by the Jewish mafia, which is devotely Zionist.
The following excerpt is from page 62 of America's Financial Apocalypse (2006).
"Already, the number of TOEFL exam applicants from China has been decreasing dramatically for the past few years, as most Chinese want to take part in their nation’s promising future. And sluggish economic conditions in America have further discouraged foreign migration. Yet, many foreign students still use America’s university system to obtain their high-tech education, only to return back to their homeland to take advantage of the economic opportunities created by corporate America.
So why does America still continue to provide foreign students admission to its best schools only to see many of them return home? This denies advanced training for U.S. citizens while empowering foreign nations. Hopefully at some point, permitting foreign students into American universities will be recognized as both an economic and national security issue, not only for science disciplines but for all disciplines. Those spots need to be reserved for Americans or foreigners who are legally obligated to remain in the U.S. for an extended period after graduation.
American universities represent a large portion of the nation’s intellectual capital. And by allowing foreign students admission, America needs to see a return on this investment. When foreign students return home after graduation, the only investment returns are registered by the economies of foreign nations."
Important Notes: This book was banned back then and remains banned today along with the author, world-class Wall Street investment analyst, Mike Stathis. Stathis has been noted by an independent analysis via AI (Grok-3) for having been the leading predictor of the 2008 financial crisis as well as one of the very best investment analysts in the world.
Yet, Stathis has been banned by all media.
Ask yourself why.
Is it because he's not Jewish?
Answer: Partially, we believe so.
But we also believe he and his book have been banned due to the massive and widespread fraud Stathis uncovered across various U.S. industries from Wall Street to healthcare.
He also exposed the realities of Social Security privitization, which would be a disaster for workers but a gold mine for Wall Street.
Stathis also detailed the very problematic "free trade" arrangements the U.S. forged with the rest of the world, focusing on China, followed by Japan as detrimental to the middle class and national security interests.
It's also important to note that Stathis was called before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. The FCIC lead investigator Chris Seefer told Stathis that he was so impressed by his research and was anxious to learn how he was able to predict so many things others missed, and that he wanted to invite him to Washington to share these insights.
However, as the interview process progressed in coming weeks, interest from the FCIC came to a screeching halt once Stathis answered why the financial crisis happened and who was to blame.
What was Stathis' answer? Stathis stated that Wall Street is run by a mafia consisting almost exclusively of Jewish individuals who are able to do anything they want without the threat of punishment. Stathis also pointed out that the Federal Reserve is run alsmot exclusively by Jewish individuals who work woth Wall Street. Finally, he pointed out that the securities regulators are also run largely by Jewish individuals which explains why the fraud continues. They all work together.
The FCIC did not want Stathis to provide his honest assessment in a testimony to congress as to the causes of the 2008 financial crisis because this would become public record. And they did not want the world to understand these inconvenient realities.
Stathis was also interrogated by federal agents after having submitted a formal complaint to the Securities & exchange Commission in late 2008 regarding what he described as the "illegal seizure of Washington Mutual."
Restrictions Against Reproduction: No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner and the Publisher.
These articles and commentaries cannot be reposted or used in any publications for which there is any revenue generated directly or indirectly. These articles cannot be used to enhance the viewer appeal of any website, including any ad revenue on the website, other than those sites for which specific written permission has been granted. Any such violations are unlawful and violators will be prosecuted in accordance with these laws.
Article 19 of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
This publication (written, audio and video) represents the commentary and/or criticisms from Mike Stathis or other individuals affiliated with Mike Stathis or AVA Investment Analytics (referred to hereafter as the “author”). Therefore, the commentary and/or criticisms only serve as an opinion and therefore should not be taken to be factual representations, regardless of what might be stated in these commentaries/criticisms. There is always a possibility that the author has made one or more unintentional errors, misspoke, misinterpreted information, and/or excluded information which might have altered the commentary and/or criticisms. Hence, you are advised to conduct your own independent investigations so that you can form your own conclusions. We encourage the public to contact us if we have made any errors in statements or assumptions. We also encourage the public to contact us if we have left out relevant information which might alter our conclusions. We cannot promise a response, but we will consider all valid information.