Name Email



Member Login

User ID

 

Password

Register
Forgot your password ?
+ Critical Reads
RSS Feeds
 
US Markets
Europe
Asia
Latin America
Economics
Asset Management
Precious Metals
Commodities
Media Deception
Politics
Technical Analysis
Fundamental Analysis
Miscellaneous
Fraud and Crooks
Mutual Funds
Real Estate
Healthcare
+ AVA Investment Analytics Newsletter

Who subscribes to the AVAIA newsletter?  Individual investors, financial advisers, hedge funds, endowments, and pension plans seeking the unique insights from the world's leading expert on the economic collapse.  Stathis' insights are so revealing he has been banned by the US media, which serves the interests of Wall Street. He has also been banned by the perpetual doomers, who pump gold with deceit. His track record is unprecedented. And we have NO AGENDAS. 

We have subscribers all across the USA and Canada, but also in Japan, India, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Belgium, Denmark, and the Russian Federation.  The list is growing daily, as more investors find out about Mike Stathis.

This newsletter is NOT for everyone. It is only for those who wish to advance their investment knowledge, skills and savvy. That means you will have to hard work to utilize our research.  If you are lazy, if you want people to tell you what and when to buy and sell, if you do not wish to advance your skills, DO NOT SUBSCRIBE.  Please make certain you understand what this newsletter provides before you subscribe because we do NOT provide refunds. 

 

If you want to become a great investor while benefiting from the insights of the leading expert in the collapse and one of the leading investment minds today, you should sign up for our investment newsletter.

If you are looking for easy money, please do NOT subscribe. There is NO easy money. There is NO free lunch. Investing successfully and consistently requires a lot of hard work and commitment.

If you are NOT willing to put in a lot of work, please do NOT subscribe.

If you watch CNBC, FOX and read content from those who follow this trash, or if you read the WSJ, IBD, Barron's and the countless useless financial magazines, you are not likely to benefit from this service.

Our investment newsletter should be thought of as an educational process; one that you will not find anywhere else in the world. Your path towards becoming a great investor is a process that will depend in large part on how much you are willing to put into your personal development. Along the way, we will guide you through the market, showing you unique insights and strategies. Mr. Stathis will share with you what he is doing with his own personal investment account. You will receive his legendary market forecasts, unrivaled anywhere in the world, and much more. 

You WILL make money. You WILL learn how to protect what you have. You WILL become a much better investor.

The more effort you put into the guidance we provide, the more you will benefit. The longer you subscribe, the better you will become because in addition to providing you with an analysis of the economy, market, and securities, we teach you how to understand things better. Thus, our newsletter should also be viewed as a real-time educational course. We don't just want to show you good investments or alert you of risk, we also want to show you how to become a better investor. No other investment newsletter does this. Why? Because they want you to stay dependent on them for life, using them as a crutch without helping to make you better, similar to the pharmaceutical industry.

Each monthly newsletter is approximately 40-50pp.

Special reports are sent out on occassion between issues.

You should note that we do not consider this to be a commercial website or a commercial newsletter. We do NOT have a huge staff of marketers and customer support reps for a good reason. We provide research and we want it to be affordible to everyone who wants to be freed from the depency of Wall Street, the media, and associated hacks. The only way we can do this is to keep operating costs at a minimum. Therefore, you should not expect to have every issue you have resolved immediately.  But you should expect to receive the highest quality research and investment education available. That is what we strive to provide.

Only register as a Client if you intend to purchase the newsletter service.  If you want email notifications when new articles are posted you can signup for alerts or as a member (which allows you access to the forum), but do not sign up for both unless you want duplicate email alerts.

Please do not send personal emails to Mr. Stathis. Email inquiries are intended for paid clients having issues and from prospective clients about the newsletter, customized research or trading assistance.  If you have a comment, please submit it in the comments section or the forum.

+ Mike Stathis' Track Record

You need to ask the media why they have banned Mike Stathis. There is no one in the world who can match his track record on the economic collapse. All of his other accurate forecasts aside, there was no one in the world who predicted in a book that the Dow could collapse to 6000, but who also told people to buy at 6500 in March.

This link contains Mike Stathis' track record on the economic collapse

Key Publications to get You Up to Speed

Spend some time reading the insights of Mike Stathis, from his articles to his landmark books, and you will see why others claiming to be experts with terrible track records are featured contributors to the biggest media publications and investment websites, all while Stathis has been banned.  They do NOT want you to be exposed to valuable insights. You need to wake up and smell the coffee.

Don't look at celebrity status. We have Paris Hilton for that. If you are an investor, you need to look at track records. You need to avoid those with agendas. Thereafter, you will realize it's all a big game designed to mislead you, to screw you, to take your money. Mike Stathis is the ONLY qualified TRUE expert on YOUR SIDE. 

When you see others boasting how they have been featured in the media, like CNBC or FBN, or financial websites like thestreet.com, the businessinsider, The Huffington Post, or print media like the Financial Times, the Wall Street Journal, MarketWatch, and so on, you had better run like Hell because that tells you whose side they are on and how useless they are to YOU. If you can't see that I suggest you research the track records of your favorite media whore. They are there for a good reason and it's to make sure you get hosed either through useless insight due to their ignorance, or through scare tactics or hype as a way to pitch their investments or products to you. Either way, if you pay attention to the media for investment or economic insights, I will GUARANTEE you will get screwed.

The media won't let real experts who are commiited to providing you with valuable insight in their club because that would make it more difficult for their financial sponsors (Wall Street and corporate America) to take your money. This is the way things work so I suggest you get up to speed; that is, if you want to finally end the cycle of investment losses and lies.  

The financial media is lying to you for a reason. They are Wall Street's client. Wall Street spends billions of dollars buying ads and commercials. And if the media delvered timely, accurate insights, Wall Street would be unable to take your money. That is why the media hand-picks hacks and positions them as experts, but they are almost never real experts. Their track records verify that. If you pay attention to print and broadcast media you are being fooled. If you have not learned that by now, you probably never will.  We advise you to read the articles Mike Stathis has written on media deception so you can understand the tricks they use to fool you. 

Blast from the Past: Real Estate Then and Now

+ Books

America's Healthcare Solution: An Investment in Your Future

The Wall Street Investment Bible

Cashing in on the Real Estate Bubble

America's Financial Apocalypse: How to Profit from the Next Great Depression

Fool's Gold (Part 2)
Tuesday, July 7, 2009, by Stathis
Font size:  | 

In part 1 of this article, I laid out some common sense explanations why gold is best utilized for short-term trading. Furthermore, I emphasized that gold rarely provides a good hedge against inflation. When it does, it’s most often a short-term phenomenon. In Part 2 of this series I’ll demonstrate this.

Let’s begin by looking at a gold price chart from 1975 to 2009. Note that gold prices in this chart have NOT been adjusted for inflation.
 
If you bought gold any time between 1980 and 1998 and held it, you lost out—UNLESS you made a short-term trade, or exited after a couple of years. Depending on when you bought it, you had to wait until anywhere from between 2004 and 2008 in order to make money (these periods have been roughly estimated, but you can get the general idea by studying the price chart below).
 
 
 
 
 

Okay so let’s assume you bought gold, held it for several years, and then sold it at a higher price. Did you really make a profit? Chances are, if you held gold for several years, you actually lost money after adjusting for inflation.
 
Let’s take a look at investors who held gold for 20 years. If you bought gold in 1990 for around $375, you had to wait for the recent gold bubble to make money after adjusting for inflation. But your annual rate of return would have only been around 1 or 2%.
 
Those who bought gold in 1998 or 2000 have done much better – so far. But they could lose these gains if they fail to cash out before the bubble implodes.
 
If you bought gold for say $250 in 2000, you’ve done quite well with a buy-and-hold approach, largely because you happened to have bought it just prior to the gold bull market. And because your holding period hasn’t been that long, the effects of inflation are small relative to the price appreciation.
 
Regardless, the fact is you could have done much better by trading it. Even if you aren’t a great trader there have been a couple of fairly substantial price corrections since the beginning of the gold bull market in 2002. If you were able to recognize these periods, you could have sold high and reentered low. This would have lowered your cost basis while reducing short-term liquidity risk. These two periods were easy to spot if you understand basic dynamics of asset price movements.
 
 
 
 
 
 
But as you can imagine, even this recent spike in the price of gold hasn’t combated the effects of inflation for those who held it for a longer period. So they did NOT make money.
 
In fact, they may have lost a good deal of money (depending upon how long they held it and what price they paid) due to the effects of inflation. Generally speaking, the longer they held gold, the more they lost.
 
In the chart below, I demonstrate several scenarios for an investor that bought gold at $400. If this investor happened to buy gold closer to the commencement of the bull market, he or she would have done much better.
 
When you adjust the price of gold bought any time during this twenty-year period with inflation, you would have lost money if you held it. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Therefore, when it comes to investing in gold, TIME isn’t on your side because the effects of compounding inflation add up. It’s much more important to have good TIMING. This means you need to carefully pick your entry and exit prices, while making sure to keep your investment horizon short enough so that the effects of inflation don’t neutralize any price appreciation.
 
You might imagine why gold dealers like Kitco and gold bugs never post charts of gold’s REAL value in today’s dollars. The gold-selling business (at least for investment purposes) wouldn’t do so well.
 
Instead, they show you charts of gold adjusted for inflation, which has no relevance since we are no longer on the gold standard.
 
Let’s see why.
 
Today, the inflation-adjusted price of gold from its previous high of around $900 in 1980 is roughly equal to $2200. That means gold SHOULD be $2200 today, BUT ONLY IF IT WAS LINKED TO INFLATION; but it’s not.
 
The real value of gold (in today’s dollars) would only be linked to annual inflation if we were still on the gold standard.
 
Remember, inflation is a monetary phenomenon, so any asset expected to be linked to inflation must in some way be linked to the dollar. Oil is linked to the dollar, as I have discussed on many occassions. Gold is NOT.
 
So, for those who may have bought gold in 1980 at $900/ounce, the real value is only about $350 in today's dollars (roughly estimated based on a reasonable inflation rate compounded over 30 years). 
 
Why might this be? Because annual inflation caused gold (purchased in 1980) to lose about 60% of its value since it’s not linked to the dollar, and thus does not adjusted for inflation. You can determine the real value of gold in today’s dollars at any price you paid as long as you know the compounded inflation rate since you bought it.
 
Interestingly, when you see “inflation-adjusted” price charts for gold, you ALWAYS see the price as IF INFLATION WAS FACTORED into the price of gold. But these assumptions are invalid since gold is in no way linked to inflation, since it’s no longer linked to the dollar.
 
Instead, you should be shown the REAL VALUE OF GOLD IN TODAY’S DOLLARS; that is, the buying power of gold based on the effects of inflation during your holding period.
 
Good luck.
 
You won’t ever see these charts because the gold bugs are trying to sell you gold and/or pump up the price.
 
Now that the next gold bubble has formed, the gold bugs have everyone focused on the current price of gold, reminding you that it has more than quadrupled in the past 10 years. Rather than a reason to buy gold now, it’s more of a reason to be cautious in my opinion.
 
Still not convinced that gold does poorly during inflation? Let’s examine a shorter time period. In fact, let’s take a look at the past two years. 
 
As you can see from the chart below, gold began taking off in the fall of 2007. That was the period when problems with Countrywide were brewing. At the time, while inflation was on the rise, it had not yet taken off.
 
Gold hit a record high of just over $1000 in mid-March 2008 during the Bear Stearns collapse (heist). Thereafter, gold has traded down, with several volatility spikes along the way. By early 2008, inflation was weighing in on the economy. By the summer, inflation had soared. Meanwhile, gold was still trending downward since its March highs.
 
A few months after reaching its all-time high, we also experienced numerous additional shocks to the financial system - Lehman and Washington Mutual went under, Fannie, Freddie and AIG were bailed out, TARP was passed, etc.
 
As you can see from the chart, gold spiked and corrected many times since reaching its March 2008 highs. But it’s lower now than during the peak inflation period in the summer of 2008.
 
Ask yourself why…why has the price of gold been lower than highs reached in March 2008? All of the real damage occurred AFTER that period, including a spike in the commodities bubble which caused inflation to go through the roof. Yet, all we have seen are spikes in gold, followed by sell-offs. 
 
Why did gold spike and correct many times over this period? We had many crises. 
 
The reason for the spikes and corrections is that gold is a hedge against crises. And crises are short-term events. 
 
If gold were a hedge against inflation, it would have made new highs throughout the spring and summer of 2008 when inflation was at its highs. Instead it did the opposite.
 
As you can see, the brief deflationary period in the fall of 2008 (due to the banking crisis) actually caused gold to gain its previous strength. 
 
 
 
 
Finally, by early 2009, inflation was on the rise again, but gold has been trending downward.
 
This chart further illustrates that gold serves as a hedge against deflation and other crises rather than inflation.
 
It also serves to highlight another important point. Investors who intend to take a buy-and-hold approach with gold should ONLY be concerned with the long-term moving average, which sets the price trend. And if that trend isn’t going up, they should consider selling their position during the next spike. Otherwise, they could get stuck when the bubble pops.
 
As a caveat, investors who buy gold during the early- to mid-stages of a bull market or bubble can afford to be longer term investors, while the late arrivals need to focus on short-term trading or a short investment horizon. 
 
In contrast, those who elect to trade the volatility swings in gold don’t care so much about the price trend. As the gold bubble approaches its final stages, you can see why it’s best to adapt a shorter-term mentality; that is if you want to avoid getting stuck with gold after the bubble pops. 
 
So the main question becomes…where along the bubble is gold?
 
It’s impossible for anyone to determine, but if I had to make a guess, I’d say it’s in the middle stages. If that is the case, it’s likely the bubble still has a few more years left. And I’d expect gold to go higher from these levels. I have no reason to alter my gold price forecast made in 2006.
 
Although there are many variables involved, generally speaking, you’re not likely to do particularly well investing in gold unless you bought it at for under $600, you trade it regularly, or your holding period is only a couple of years (depending on when you bought it).
 
For any period beyond this, you face the risk of holding the empty bag when gold corrects, much like those who bought it in 1980.  If that happens, you’ll have the added effects of inflation eating away at your principal. The modified chart below illustrates this.
 
 
 
 
 
 
No one knows where gold is headed or when the bubble will burst. The gold bugs are unwilling to even acknowledge that there is a gold bubble forming. Just remember this - the higher it goes, the harder it will fall. This is how all asset bubbles play out. And if you get stuck holding gold when the bubble bursts, you could end up losing a lot of money, especially since gold fails to keep up with inflation over long periods; periods that typify post-bubble corrections.
 
While you’re waiting years to break even before you sell, inflation will gradually eat away at your principal.
 
 
 
 
 
The lesson is—buy-and-hold doesn’t work. It never did; not for stocks, not for oil, and certainly NOT for gold. Timing DOES matter, but so does valuation. If you’re good at one and not the other, you can still do pretty good. If you’re good at both, you’ll join a very elite group of investors whose names you probably don’t know.
 
Now if you still doubt what I say, check back with me in say 15 or 20 years. By then, gold will likely have come down (from whatever high it makes) to $400, and maybe $300 per ounce. I’m willing to bet on it.  
 
Until then, gold is likely to go higher. But unless you really understand the dynamics of gold price movements, or unless you trade the volatility, you’ll most likely get burned if you buy gold at current levels.
 
Remember, the higher price you pay, the more risk you add because this bubble WILL eventually burst. Only by understanding the realities about gold can you plan for a profitable exit.
 
In Part 3, I’m going to show you the real value of gold as an asset class.
 
  
 
NOTE: I continue to face widespread censorship for the cold hard truth I speak, as I see it. My intention is to wake the people up so they will realize just how useless and deceitful the mainstream media is.  I ask that you do your part to help with this mission by emailing my articles to your friends and adding the articles to the various online syndication options provided at the top right-hand side of each article. Together, we can make a difference.
 
 
Copyright © 2009. Mike Stathis. All Rights Reserved.
 
Restrictions Against Reproduction: No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner and the Publisher. These articles and commentaries cannot be reposted or used in any publications for which there is any revenue generated directly or indirectly. These articles cannot be used to enhance the viewer appeal of any website, including any ad revenue on the website, other than those sites for which specific written permission has been granted. Any such violations are unlawful and violators will be prosecuted in accordance with these laws.
 
Requests to the Publisher for permission or further information should be sent to info@apexva.com
 
 
 
 
Bookmark and Share
Recent Comments

User Name : tyoungos Dated : July 10, 2009 09:13:19

 

This is a masterpiece of gold info!

 

 
User Name : jmoltzen Dated : November 16, 2009 14:42:22

 

I just want to know what you have to say about the topics you cover in this article now that gold has obviously broken out far past its 2008 highs and is around 1140 as of today. Yes, gold could and possibly should correct at any time now, but so long as its above 1033 or so, your entire prognosis about the shorter time horizon depiction of Gold vs. Inflation is wholely incorrect.

I am not 'that guy' who looks for little incorrect intricacies in analyst predictions and calls them out on them. Rather, I am of the belief that Gold is the ultimate form of currency, and indeed does protect against inflation. Not on a minute to minute comparison, but rather, using a bastardized version the fabled quotation as my evidence: An Ounce of Gold has been able to buy a person a finely tailored suit of clothing befitting of a king or at least a wealthy man, since the beginning of time....

I am not disputing your evidence against the media and its pumpers for gold. Everyone has an agenda. However, in having an interest in gold and its price myself, I feel that the "evidence" you used in "proving" that gold was not holding up to inflationary pressures has given way to the direct opposite, and I want to know what your thoughts are now that this has occurred. Feel free to email me your answer, or if you respond here, please email me to let me know you've done so.

Thanks.
Respectfully,
John Moltzen
jmoltzen(AT)comcast.net

 

 
User Name : mike Dated : November 16, 2009 23:10:08

 

First, I'd like to say that as far as you not being "the guy that looks for incorrect intricacies in analyst predictions and calls them out on them," I welcome any challenges, although I cannot guarantee I will have time to respond. And if I find myself wrong, I will admit it. I do not feel that my analysis was incorrect at all. You should always scrutinize what everyone says because most people, even those who have been proclaimed as experts are wrong more than they are right. Most of the time, they are tainted by their own agendas. In fact, I wish more people would scrutinize what people who have media exposure say like Roubini, Schiff, etc., unlike me who the media has banned. You might want to ask yourself why I have been banned. Could it be because I represent the truth (along with an impressive track record which none of these men can come close to), and the truth won't create easy money for Wall Street to take from the media's audience? The answer is yes.

If you read through the 3-part series and/or my 2006 book America's Financial Apocalypse, I forecast gold to head to $1400 by around 2012-2014 and possibly up to $2000 a few years later.

The point of the article is to explain the basis of gold price appreciation and to warn so many who have been fooled by gold bugs that they need to devise an exit strategy at some point, rather than hoarding gold with no exit point, as gold WILL eventually correct back down in the 400s, perhaps lower, where it will stay for many years. I do not expect this to happen for some time, maybe a long time, but it will happen.

However, gold does not hedge against inflation. This is a fact that cannot be disputed. It can only hedge against inflation if the gold bugs create propaganda to push the price up as they have lately. However, by itself it will not hedge against inflation.

Once again, I encourage you to read the article again. Examine long-term data, not recent price performance during the gold bull market. Gold has been in a bull market since 2001, so of course it will go up with inflation or deflation because when assets are in bull markets, they go up for reasons other than their investment correlation. In short, they go up due to speculation.

As further evidence of speculation, I encourage you to check any asset management text and you will see that gold has a correlation coefficient of about -1, meaning that it has an almost perfect negative correlation to the stock market. But gold has risen along with the market, implying speculation.

Since I wrote my article, the technicals changed and I informed readers of my newsletter of that. But still, gold does not protect against inflation. In order to do that, it must be linked to the dollar because inflation is a monetary phenomenon. When we were on the gold standard, one could argue that it hedged against inflation.

The best hedge against inflation is commodities, specifically oil since the dollar is backed by oil. You must have dollars to buy oil around the world. That is why oil prices ris with a falling dollar. You can ask the media ham Jim Rogers about that and I'm sure he will agree.

If you want protection against inflation, you are much better off buying oil, although there are no simple forumulas for asset protection during these difficult economic times.

Gold will continue to rise, but the risk is high and I can do much better with my cash than holding gold. Gold is best used as a hedge against market declines. It is best to trade the volatility of gold rather than to hold it.

Feel free to ask the biggest gold bug about this - Peter Schiff - if he is willing to debate me on this. Of course, Schiff is the exclusive distributor in the US of the Perth Mint, so he has an obvious financial agenda. I would gladly welcome such a debate on a neutral platform. I would be very surprised if he agrees. After all, it's much easier to get your point across unchallenged when your critics are media hams.

Remember, unlike everyone else, I am the only investment professional with no agendas. I don't sell securities or gold. And I don't sell gold or securities ads. Agendas often determine one's stance.

I could care less where gold goes. If I think it is a good risk-reward I can always buy some. If I don't I can avoid it. Most people fail to see that when I dispel these myths, like those surrounding gold or hyperinflation, I am actually on the side of the average Joe because I am protecting them from the extremist myths spread by those who stand to gain from spreading propaganda. Instead, they get upset because I have stated things they are not accustomed to hearing. I find this unfortunate and dangerous to their financial future.

Remember, the key is to have an exit strategy because the gold bull market will not last forever. It could last for another 5, 8 or 10 years; who knows. But I do know for certain that it will not persist indefinitely. Many bull markets and bubbles have different courses and last for variable time periods, but they all have the same fate.

Good luck!

 

 
User Name : bluecho Dated : November 18, 2009 23:07:37

 

Hi Mike, I just found out about you/your book/this website yesterday. Your opinions are straightforward and insightful, really appreciate your time and efforts on this. I will order your book in a few days, and start from there.

I've read all three parts of this gold piece, here are some thoughts coming to my mind.
1. Per your point of gold is not a hedge for inflation, looking at the gold pricing over last two year, could it be gold has been priced against "Expectation of inflation", not inflation itself? For example, 2008 summer, while inflation was still high, I am not sure that's the case with expected inflation. As we all know, it's forward-looking indicators that move market (of course, this is more for a trading point of view instead of investment point of view. )
2. Although Gold is not linked to dollar as oil does, it's still mostly priced in dollar. Also, gold certainly is an alternative to dollar as far as central bank reserve portfolio goes. I don't know what % of gold is for reserve purpose, but central bank's moves on gold did move market like what happened with India central bank's gold purchase. By all means, with a case of weak dollar (a higher probability scenario, IMHO), gold does seem to have a decent chance to continue its way up, until the bubble bursts.

3. I fully agree with your point of not "buy and hold" gold, but trade it. It seems to me that your "do not buy gold" view is based on a rather long time period, 10 year or decades. However, I suspect that the proportion of people implementing "buy and hold" strategy is declining among all the people who have exposure to different investment assets since normal people not only have much more information (both educational and with market), but also more investment options (products, markets). In the meantime, due to the ever-growing correlation in global politics and economy, major economic factors are now intertwined in more complicated ways and impact upon each other with higher speed. As a result, I dare to say that we'll and are seeing more "traders" than "investors" in both the institutional market and retail market, which means the relevant time span for everyone is generally shortened. Your analysis of the Macro is truly excellent, but I suspect it would be more helpful for your readers to have a view with shorter time span. In this volatile and uncertain world, people probably cares more about what will happen in next 6-12 months than what will happen in 10 years. It could just be me, who is a foreigner only lived in the States for a few years, so not your typical reader. I do feel your site will have much more followers if the articles cover market more from a trading point of view. Maybe your newsletter cover this, which I intend to find out later. Or the short-term thing could not be your forte. I bring this up because I have enormous respect for what you write, not only the contents, but also your coverage to stay true, and hope you'd continue to write (it's selfish, I know).

Many thanks!

 

 
User Name : bluecho Dated : November 18, 2009 23:08:06

 

Hi Mike, I just found out about you/your book/this website yesterday. Your opinions are straightforward and insightful, really appreciate your time and efforts on this. I will order your book in a few days, and start from there.

I've read all three parts of this gold piece, here are some thoughts coming to my mind.
1. Per your point of gold is not a hedge for inflation, looking at the gold pricing over last two year, could it be gold has been priced against "Expectation of inflation", not inflation itself? For example, 2008 summer, while inflation was still high, I am not sure that's the case with expected inflation. As we all know, it's forward-looking indicators that move market (of course, this is more for a trading point of view instead of investment point of view. )
2. Although Gold is not linked to dollar as oil does, it's still mostly priced in dollar. Also, gold certainly is an alternative to dollar as far as central bank reserve portfolio goes. I don't know what % of gold is for reserve purpose, but central bank's moves on gold did move market like what happened with India central bank's gold purchase. By all means, with a case of weak dollar (a higher probability scenario, IMHO), gold does seem to have a decent chance to continue its way up, until the bubble bursts.

3. I fully agree with your point of not "buy and hold" gold, but trade it. It seems to me that your "do not buy gold" view is based on a rather long time period, 10 year or decades. However, I suspect that the proportion of people implementing "buy and hold" strategy is declining among all the people who have exposure to different investment assets since normal people not only have much more information (both educational and with market), but also more investment options (products, markets). In the meantime, due to the ever-growing correlation in global politics and economy, major economic factors are now intertwined in more complicated ways and impact upon each other with higher speed. As a result, I dare to say that we'll and are seeing more "traders" than "investors" in both the institutional market and retail market, which means the relevant time span for everyone is generally shortened. Your analysis of the Macro is truly excellent, but I suspect it would be more helpful for your readers to have a view with shorter time span. In this volatile and uncertain world, people probably cares more about what will happen in next 6-12 months than what will happen in 10 years. It could just be me, who is a foreigner only lived in the States for a few years, so not your typical reader. I do feel your site will have much more followers if the articles cover market more from a trading point of view. Maybe your newsletter cover this, which I intend to find out later. Or the short-term thing could not be your forte. I bring this up because I have enormous respect for what you write, not only the contents, but also your coverage to stay true, and hope you'd continue to write (it's selfish, I know).

Many thanks!

 

 
User Name : mike Dated : November 19, 2009 16:09:05

 

bluecho, gold is moving up because it is in a bull market as it has been since late 2001. It is also moving up due to speculation and propaganda. If everyone believes it will be a good hedge against inflation, it will because they will buy it forcing the price up!! But eventually, reality sets in.

As far as providing guidance and so forth, I rarely issue these thinsg anymore because the media (even websites) have banned me, so thanks to them, you will have to pay now via my newsletter. You can thank the media and all the bloggers, financial websites an so forth for this. They caused me to chrage for this since I have to pay operational costs of this website.


Telling the truth and having no bias or agendas comes at a huge cost. The media has banned me as a result. This has adversely affected my life. You people need to understand the media is YOUR ENEMY. THEY ARE AGAINST YOU. THEY ARE ON THE SIDE OF WALL STREET AND WILL REPORT ACCORDINGLY. WALL STREET AND CORPORATIONS PAY THE BILLS OF THE MEDIA, so they will always have their interests in mind.

Letthe media know you won't fall for their tricks anymore. Demand the truth. Demand to hear from real experts with execellent track records, experts with no agendas, instead of clowns and extremists, all with terrible track records.

 

 




View all comments (6) Post Comments Printer friendly version


click to subscribe for teleconference
Client Login

User ID

 

Password

Register
Forgot your password ?

Archives