Name Email

REGISTER as a MEMBER
if you want to access the Forums and Chat Room.

It's FREE.

Member Login

User ID

 

Password

Register
Forgot your password ?
+ Critical Reads
Survey

At what age do you think you will be able to retire?

55

60

65

70

Never

I'm already retired, but I may need to start working again

View Results

RSS Feeds
 
US Markets
Europe
Asia
Latin America
Economics
Asset Management
Precious Metals
Commodities
Media Deception
Politics
Technical Analysis
Fundamental Analysis
Miscellaneous
Fraud and Crooks
Mutual Funds
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Finance
+ AVA Investment Analytics Newsletter

Who subscribes to the AVAIA newsletter?  Individual investors, financial advisers, hedge funds, endowments, and pension plans seeking the unique insights from the world's leading expert on the economic collapse.  Stathis' insights are so revealing he has been banned by the U.S. media establshment, which serves the interests of Wall Street and corporate America.

He has also been banned by the perpetual doomers, who pump gold with deceit. We have NO AGENDAS. 

We have subscribers all across the USA and Canada, but also in Japan, India, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Belgium, Denmark, and the Russian Federation.  The list is growing daily, as more investors find out about Mike Stathis.

This newsletter is NOT for everyone. It is only for those who wish to advance their investment knowledge, skills and savvy. That means you will have to hard work to utilize our research.  If you are lazy, if you want people to tell you what and when to buy and sell, if you do not wish to advance your skills, DO NOT SUBSCRIBE.  Please make certain you understand what this newsletter provides before you subscribe because we do NOT provide refunds. 

 

If you want to become a great investor while benefiting from the insights of the leading expert in the collapse and one of the leading investment minds today, you should sign up for our investment newsletter.

If you are looking for easy money, please do NOT subscribe. There is NO easy money. Investing successfully on a consistent basis requires a lot of hard work and commitment. We will provide you with the best guidance available.

If you are NOT willing to put in a lot of work, please do NOT subscribe.

If you watch CNBC, FOX and read content from those who follow this trash, or if you read the WSJ, IBD, Barron's and the countless useless financial magazines, you are not likely to benefit from this service.

Our investment newsletter should be thought of as an educational process; one that you will not find anywhere else in the world. Your path towards becoming a great investor is a process that will depend in large part on how much you are willing to put into your personal development. Along the way, we will guide you through the market, showing you unique insights and strategies. Finally, you will receive his legendary market forecasts, unrivaled anywhere in the world. 

You WILL make money. You WILL learn how to protect what you have. You WILL become a much better investor.

The more effort you put into the guidance we provide, the more you will benefit. The longer you subscribe, the better you will become because in addition to providing you with an analysis of the economy, market, and securities, we teach you how to understand things better. Thus, our newsletter should also be viewed as a real-time educational course. We don't just want to show you good investments or alert you of risk, we also want to show you how to become a better investor. No other investment newsletter does this.

Each monthly newsletter is approximately 40-50pp.

Special reports are sent out on occassion between issues.

You should note that we do not consider this to be a commercial website or a commercial newsletter. We do NOT have a huge staff of marketers and customer support reps for a good reason. We provide research and we want it to be affordible to everyone who wants to be freed from the depency of Wall Street, the media, and associated hacks. The only way we can do this is to keep operating costs at a minimum. Therefore, you should not expect to have every issue you have resolved immediately.  But you should expect to receive the highest quality research and investment education available. That is what we strive to provide.

Only register as a Client if you intend to purchase the newsletter service.  If you want email notifications when new articles are posted you can signup for alerts or as a member (which allows you access to the forum), but do not sign up for both unless you want duplicate email alerts.

Please do not send personal emails to Mr. Stathis. Email inquiries are intended for paid clients having issues and from prospective clients about the newsletter, customized research or trading assistance.  If you have a comment, please submit it in the comments section or the forum.

+ Mike Stathis' Track Record

You need to ask the media why they have banned Mike Stathis. There is no one in the world who can match his track record on the economic collapse. All of his other accurate forecasts aside, there was no one in the world who predicted in a book that the Dow could collapse to 6000, but who also told people to buy at 6500 in March. He predicted (in his 2006 book) that Fannie and Freddie would be bailed out, and so much more.

This link contains Mike Stathis' track record on the economic collapse.

Key Publications to get You Up to Speed

Spend some time reading the insights of Mike Stathis, from his articles to his landmark books, and you will see why others claiming to be experts with terrible track records are featured contributors to the biggest media publications and investment websites, all while Stathis has been banned.  They do NOT want you to be exposed to valuable insights. You need to wake up and smell the coffee.

Don't look at celebrity status. We have Paris Hilton for that. If you are an investor, you need to look at track records. You need to very carefully examine the track record of every person you decide to follow. You need to avoid those with agendas. Thereafter, you will realize it's all a big game designed to mislead you, to screw you, to take your money. Mike Stathis is the ONLY real expert on YOUR SIDE. 

When you see others boasting how they have been featured in the media, like CNBC or FBN, or financial websites like thestreet.com, the businessinsider, The Huffington Post, or print media like the Financial Times, the Wall Street Journal, MarketWatch, and so on, you had better run like Hell because that tells you whose side they are on and how useless they are to YOU. If you can't see that I suggest you research the track records of your favorite financial media celebrity. They are there for a good reason and it's to make sure you get hosed either through useless insight due to their ignorance, or through scare tactics or hype as a way to pitch their investments or products to you. Either way, if you pay attention to the media for investment or economic insights, I will GUARANTEE you will get screwed.

The media won't let real experts who are commiited to providing you with valuable insight in their club because that would make it more difficult for their financial sponsors (Wall Street and corporate America) to take your money. This is the way things work so I suggest you get up to speed; that is, if you want to finally end the cycle of investment losses and lies.  

The financial media is lying to you for a reason. They are Wall Street's client. Wall Street spends billions of dollars buying ads and commercials. And if the media delvered timely, accurate insights, Wall Street would be unable to take your money.

That is why the media hand-picks hacks and positions them as experts, but they are almost never real experts. Their track records verify that. On the (very) rare occassion the financial media actually airs real experts, they are there to manipulate the sheep.  Consider the case of Warren Buffet for instance.

If you pay attention to print and broadcast media you are being fooled. If you have not learned that by now, you probably never will.  We advise you to read the articles Mike Stathis has written on media deception so you can understand the tricks they use to fool you. 

Blast from the Past: Real Estate Then and Now

+ Books

America's Healthcare Solution: An Investment in Your Future

The Wall Street Investment Bible

Cashing in on the Real Estate Bubble

America's Financial Apocalypse: How to Profit from the Next Great Depression

Why No One Won a Pulitzer for Financial Reporting (Part 1)
Wednesday, August 5, 2009, by Stathis
Font size:  | 

Amidst the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression (if not ever) and the biggest Ponzi scheme ever, (the real estate-banking Ponzi scheme) not one of the 65 Pulitzer Prizes was awarded for coverage of the events surrounding the “financial crisis.” Ironically, the media has yet to identify this crisis as the biggest Ponzi scheme ever, confirming their incompetence.

Disgraceful? Yes. Surprising? No. It’s all about content. It’s always been about content. Valuable content drives readers, listeners and viewers, which appeals to sponsors. Valuable content is highly treasured because it’s so rare today.

 

This relationship generates healthy revenues for newspapers and more business for their sponsors. But media executives disagree. They feel that the best way to secure healthy profits is by serving the interests of the guys who pay the bills; ad sponsors; this means corporate America. And for the financial media, it’s all about serving the agendas of the financial industry.

 
The problem is that the value of content with most U.S. newspapers has been in decline for many years. And now, media executives are realizing that content matters. Perhaps now they realize that ultimately, the audience pays the bills, for without an audience, there will be no money for ads.
 
It has only been since the widespread use of the Internet that many have discovered just how much newspaper content is slanted, biased, deceptive and irresponsible. The same situation exists with broadcast media. But soon, they will feel the effects of the Internet as online video content grows.
 
Prior to the Internet, America’s media moguls sought to seize even more control of the hearts and minds of Americans in order to satisfy the needs of their financial sponsors and political agendas. And they were successful.
 
Today, America’s mainstream media machine is primarily owned by a small group of men. And they don’t just own television networks or newspapers. They own television networks AND newspapers AND radio stations. This is why you get the same bull regardless where you turn.
 
This carefully guarded control has created a very dangerous form of censorship that few realize because America’s media industry puts out the same messages and rarely allows an open platform for the exchange of opposing viewpoints by credible experts. I know this from first-hand experience.
 
But the Internet is beginning to crash their party. Slowly but surely, the truth is coming out. Slowly but surely, more people are coming to know who I am and the value behind my content. Regardless who you speak of, from the media to the feds, they have all used their own methods to attempt to silence me. And I expect more to come as my audience grows. This is just one reason why I plan to leave America for good in the future. Perhaps you might also consider such a move; perhaps for other reasons.
 
When it comes to dishing out excuses for the demise of America’s very powerful and dangerous propaganda machine, media executives resemble Big 3 executives. Common to both industries, the excuse always lies with “the economy” or “the Internet.” It’s not “the economy.” Yes, it is the Internet; not the cost advantages though. The Internet has broken through the stronghold of the media monopoly.
 
The mainstream media no longer holds complete control of media distribution. We the people now have a say in distribution through the Internet. As a consequence, the truth is coming out. But you have to use your mind so you can spot sift through the smoke screens. If you’ve been following my writings for some time now, you probably already realize that I view myself as a substantial part of this movement.
 
I find it laughable that media executives and critics always come back to the Internet as the reason for their demise. All major newspapers have an Internet presence. When people are provided with an abundant variety of unbiased alternative media, they can see more clearly. They can spot the media spin and they run away for good.
 
In the end, the mainstream media won’t win because it’s always been about content; not lies and spins. But they will only lose if you wake up and realize how you’re being fooled.
 
Valuable content unattached to financial and political agendas is growing each day in cyberspace. Newspapers are the early casualties of this growing trend. Down the road, broadcast media will suffer the same consequences.
 
As I’ve been saying all along, the media is hiding the truth. But it goes beyond that. The vast majority of reporters lack sufficient understanding required to decipher the deception and fraud that continues to this today. Furthermore, most of today’s journalists are irresponsible, rarely verifying leads and never adequately researching track records of the so-called “experts” they interview.
 
Instead, they associate credibility with their media exposure. Instead, they play by the “follow the leader” mentality. Once one guy is interviewed on one network, the others interview him even when he’s clueless; even when he’s almost always wrong.
 
It’s not about being right. It’s all about providing you with entertainment. It’s also about exposure; flooding you with a name and face you recognize; name and face recognition rather than value; or so the media executives think. They mistakenly refer to this as being branded. It’s more like being flooded with trash.
 
This mentality explains why you still see countless shills like Ben Stein discuss investments on TV despite having one of the worst track records over the past few years. As you can imagine, this creates a perpetual loop of useless content. That’s why you see the same goofballs with horrendous track records being interviewed over and over.
 
You even see this type of behavior on the Internet, as bloggers try to attach themselves with “experts” quoted in the mainstream media as a way to draw an audience or to imply some form of credibility.
 
They also like to “catch a ride aboard the mainstream bandwagon” by giving book reviews from authors published by the same mainstream media machine – big publishers.  But these authors are the same guys who have sold out to broadcast and print media. It’s truly sickening, and it demonstrates these followers have no ability to think critically on their own. They are mere robots, not thought leaders. You need to recognize this pattern of behavior and stay away from this trash.
 
When you combine these elements, you get some harsh consequences for the media industry; bankruptcy. The newspapers are struggling to stay afloat not because the economy is bad, and not because they have no Internet presence.
 
The real reason for their demise is because people are tired of the lies, deception and incompetence. And now they have a choice. It's all about valuable content. And the mainstream media doesn't have it. They intentionally focus on serving their ad sponsors when determining content. And now they’re paying the price.
 
Media executives thought they could be successful by serving the financial and political agendas of their sponsors, but the verdict is in. Americans refuse to waste their time on lies and incompetent reporting.
 
This all brings me to the recent Pulitzer Awards; none of which went to any “professional” journalists covering the current economic mess. But understand this. If these awards were open to everyone, there would have been many awards passed out.
 
During the awards ceremony, Paul Krugman was mentioned for his so-called "prophetic columns on the economic perils."  Are you kidding me?  Krugman simply stated the obvious. 
 
What I find troubling is that he continues to avoid asking the really difficult questions and raising the most critical issues. Furthermore, he never addressed the real fraud by the Fed, Treasury and banking cartel. In fact, he hasn’t even made mention of the banking cartel. Krugman is no different than the other hacks in the media. You need to realize this. Stop being brainwashed by the liars in the mainstream media.
 
If you know too much and you speak the truth, you won’t get published or interviewed by any journalist because that would hurt their sponsors. This explains why Krugman is published by the New York Times and is seen on television, along with the others who appear to be on your side, but who really downplay things.
 
They aren’t on your side. At best, they’re Monday morning quarterbacks. At worst, they’re masters of deception, extremists, perpetual doomers, and snake-oil salesmen; Shiller, Schiff, Roubini, etc. Make no mistake. They have very little credibility. And they don’t deliver valuable content. If you read and listen to what they have to say, you’ll get burned.
 
If you think these guys truly know what’s going on; if you think they are addressing the real issues, you’ve been fooled. Always remember this. If you aren’t getting the full story, you’re being lied to. And if you’re spending most of your time giving interviews, you aren’t spending the time needed to know what’s going on. But you will fool the sheep, who’ve been brainwashed to equate media exposure with expertise.  
 
You need to understand that the media works with Wall Street and Washington to hide what’s most critical for investors. Only after it’s too late do they come clean. This is why the masses get slaughtered during bubble implosions. If they aired credible experts who had real insights with no agendas, the insiders wouldn’t be so successful in taking your retirement funds now would they.
 
Always remember this fact. You can never and will never receive any valuable investment guidance from anyone who deals in selling securities because they have a stake in pitching their own slant on things in order to boost their business.
 
Maybe if Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, New York Times and several other newspapers had not refused to publish my op-ed pieces, they might have actually won a Pulitzer (with editorial help of course) for coverage of the economic crisis. 
 
I find it ironic that at least one of the recent winners of the Pulitzer was laid off. If he/she had only won a Pulitzer for covering the economic crisis, I can assure you he/she would still be employed.
 
 
 
NOTE: I continue to face widespread censorship for the cold hard truth I speak, as I see it. My intention is to wake the people up so they will realize just how useless and deceitful the mainstream media is.  I ask that you do your part to help with this mission by emailing my articles to your friends and adding the articles to the various online syndication options provided at the top right-hand side of each article. Together, we can make a difference.
 
 
Copyright © 2009. Mike Stathis. All Rights Reserved.
 
Restrictions Against Reproduction: No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner and the Publisher. These articles and commentaries cannot be reposted or used in any publications for which there is any revenue generated directly or indirectly. These articles cannot be used to enhance the viewer appeal of any website, including any ad revenue on the website, other than those sites for which specific written permission has been granted. Any such violations are unlawful and violators will be prosecuted in accordance with these laws.
 
Requests to the Publisher for permission or further information should be sent to info@apexva.com
 
 
 
 
Bookmark and Share
Recent Comments

User Name : AndreD Dated : August 6, 2009 01:18:48

 

I've always seen the failure of the AOL / Time Warner "merger" as an indication for the sad fact that internet and mainstream media don't go together yet (mentally, that is; despite the fact that there are no technological hurdles).

Let's look at something I see as an analogy: Rumour has it that decades ago, telco managers were invited to an Internet conference where voice-over-Internet technologies were discussed, and they just left. This in turn has left customers with being charged for two infrastructures which, from the customer's point of view, are capable of providing the same services, despite the significant tehnological differences. Only recently (if you look at the whole process and ignore isolated phenomenons like technologies used for transatlantic cables) have the telcos begun to change their infrastructure to the much more flexible Internet approach.

If we were to wait that long for a change of attitude amongst the mainstream media that would be bad news. However, the financial situation of the media as well as the fact that many people stopped to believe ANYTHING regardless of where the information comes from may be an indication that this process will be a faster one than that of the telco/Internet harmonisation.

 

 
User Name : rjlull1 Dated : August 6, 2009 06:03:18

 

Great article as usual. If most journalists wrote the truth they wouldn't have jobs. They would be driving cabs.

I wonder how long until U.S.A. internet becomes censored ala' China?

 

 
User Name : mike Dated : August 6, 2009 09:55:49

 

They won't censor the Internet, at least in the way you are thinking. You see, the U.S. media engages in a different type of censorship; a hidden form of censorship that few recognize. I have explained how this works in my media deception articles. But basically, they only give you one side, or at best, two sides (with the opposing side positioned with low credibility via attacks or power through numbers, etc.). As well, as a way to cover their back so they can claim they gave you the truth at a later date, they air a credible viewpoints, but this comprises a tiny portion of broadcast time (same in print media). In doing so, they use the flooding approach (repetition on the same network/newspaper and the same views between networks/newspapers because they all have partnerships with each other). You conclude validation through repetition of the views they want you to accept.

In short, it has been designed in that manner in order to make people think there is no censorship when in fact there is. In my view, China has less censorship than America because in China, you know what they don't let you see and read. In America, everything is manipulated giving the impression there is no censorship.

 

 
User Name : KyleKrol Dated : August 23, 2009 19:58:12

 

Great article!

 

 




View all comments (4) Post Comments Printer friendly version


click to subscribe for teleconference
Client Login

User ID

 

Password

Register
Forgot your password ?

Archives